Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080623

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080623 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.58% of octets and 22.27% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 2 10.06M
5 1.490M 7 10.50M
10 1.615M 13 11.07M
50 3.349M 58 17.85M
90 16.43M 59 50.55M
95 26.32M 59 73.05M
99 64.86M 59 183.3M
99.9 153.4M 59 449.2M
99.99 951.1M 60 1.372G
99.999 1.025G 129 5.780G
100 27.00G 135 6.771G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.54% 911.1M
Medium (100-1400B)8.80% 14.94G
Large (1401-1500B)90.56% 153.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 168.8M
Total100.00% 169.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.89% 81.19T 33.06% 56.12G 36.83% 3.194M
Encrypted Traffic10.11% 24.94T 10.28% 17.44G 7.63% 661.6k
Advanced Apps6.69% 16.51T 6.75% 11.46G 8.09% 701.5k
File Sharing3.36% 8.294T 3.35% 5.689G 2.59% 224.4k
Measurement1.77% 4.363T 1.83% 3.109G 0.23% 19.85k
Misc0.62% 1.531T 0.70% 1.191G 0.82% 71.28k
Games0.18% 448.5G 0.18% 312.1M 0.24% 20.87k
Audio/Video0.15% 359.0G 0.15% 253.5M 0.28% 24.10k
Unidentified44.24% 109.1T 43.69% 74.17G 43.29% 3.755M
Total100.00% 246.8T 100.00% 169.7G 100.00% 8.673M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.022G150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
374.1M150029Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
353.5M150013Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
252.0M150011ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
214.1M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
187.6M150025NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
180.7M138811NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
170.2M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
163.5M150015NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
99.56M149410Indiana [87]TRANSPAC [22388]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.071G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]43475 -> 5101
1.057G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]37332 -> 5101
571.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]52077 -> 5101
496.8M150021Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]53246 -> 10000
364.0M150013Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]35124 -> 10000
344.3M150017MIEN1 [11442]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]42297 -> 59129
332.9M150016ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]44150 -> 10000
325.8M150013NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
306.0M142059Unknown [40127]FSU [2553]HTTP
270.1M150011Unknown [0]U Arkansas [10508]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 678.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.84% 254.3T 42.14% 321.2G
Encrypted Traffic7.39% 43.89T 7.86% 59.90G
Advanced Apps3.87% 22.98T 3.42% 26.10G
File Sharing3.25% 19.27T 3.56% 27.15G
Misc2.83% 16.78T 5.77% 43.95G
Audio/Video1.68% 9.995T 1.50% 11.40G
Measurement0.94% 5.592T 0.95% 7.240G
Games0.31% 1.818T 0.42% 3.216G
Unidentified36.89% 219.0T 34.38% 262.1G
Total100.00% 593.6T 100.00% 762.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
37.67%
2.16%
1.77%
1.23%
---
223.6T
12.83T
10.51T
7.302T
---
37.87%
1.69%
1.48%
1.09%
---
288.7G
12.87G
11.31G
8.305G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.41%
2.54%
0.43%
0.02%
0.00%
---
26.15T
15.07T
2.565T
91.45G
5.766G
---
3.98%
3.28%
0.57%
0.02%
0.00%
---
30.36G
24.96G
4.368G
173.4M
32.66M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.11%
0.71%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.46T
4.197T
209.3G
65.80G
34.72G
11.77G
---
2.78%
0.58%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
---
21.20G
4.391G
222.2M
89.06M
82.47M
116.0M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.20%
0.98%
0.67%
0.26%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.131T
5.838T
3.972T
1.522T
607.0G
100.1G
65.44G
20.59G
7.407G
5.445G
3.353G
241.8M
70.06M
---
1.88%
0.78%
0.49%
0.27%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.36G
5.944G
3.751G
2.049G
678.7M
199.0M
86.75M
27.23M
6.516M
6.719M
39.00M
464.6k
75.10k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
NFS
X11
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
RTIP
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.33%
0.79%
0.27%
0.18%
0.12%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.896T
4.696T
1.597T
1.084T
707.1G
275.6G
249.4G
55.77G
50.01G
47.18G
38.06G
35.85G
21.41G
12.05G
12.04G
4.996G
147.8M
---
2.81%
0.48%
1.68%
0.26%
0.09%
0.08%
0.07%
0.04%
0.09%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.41G
3.677G
12.82G
1.989G
696.5M
588.6M
552.6M
324.4M
654.1M
431.3M
348.6M
226.4M
66.49M
93.93M
56.26M
9.781M
1.915M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.17%
0.47%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.944T
2.763T
172.5G
60.63G
39.93G
10.17G
1.780G
1.609G
22.50M
---
0.78%
0.66%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.971G
5.002G
275.6M
75.62M
55.52M
14.24M
4.170M
3.528M
16.60k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.87%
0.07%
0.00%
---
5.148T
443.5G
0.000
---
0.63%
0.32%
0.00%
---
4.815G
2.424G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.22%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.324T
207.8G
102.3G
90.89G
73.84G
13.87G
5.440G
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.08%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.866G
452.9M
644.6M
91.30M
129.0M
22.25M
10.04M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
36.89%
---
219.0T
---
34.38%
---
262.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
593.6T
---
100.00%
---
762.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 443.5G 0.32% 2.424G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.02M 0.00% 1.186M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 151.4G 0.03% 214.9M
TCP[6]91.48% 543.1T 87.33% 665.7G
UDP[17]7.36% 43.68T 11.17% 85.15G
IPv6[41]0.00% 9.596G 0.00% 26.91M
GRE[47]0.61% 3.613T 0.55% 4.190G
ESP[50]0.43% 2.565T 0.57% 4.368G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.261G 0.00% 34.95M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 91.50G 0.02% 173.9M
Total100.00% 593.6T 100.00% 762.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.26% 299.3G
Medium (100-1400B)20.30% 154.7G
Large (1401-1500B)40.40% 307.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 315.1M
Total100.00% 762.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.45% 572.5T 97.19% 740.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.04% 226.2G 0.05% 349.7M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 51.06G 0.02% 160.3M
Other3.51% 20.81T 2.74% 20.88G
Total100.00% 593.6T 100.00% 762.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 2.802T 0.27% 2.095G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.05% 6.250T 1.25% 9.515G
21281.01% 5.999T 1.01% 7.720G
543210.52% 3.104T 0.32% 2.443G
45000.40% 2.362T 0.41% 3.107G
150000.38% 2.267T 0.42% 3.207G