Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080616

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080616 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.52% of octets and 23.14% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.389M 2 10.05M
5 1.487M 9 10.50M
10 1.611M 16 11.07M
50 3.485M 58 18.86M
90 14.21M 59 55.80M
95 21.07M 59 78.45M
99 57.83M 59 161.3M
99.9 141.0M 59 417.4M
99.99 957.7M 118 1.250G
99.999 1.037G 159 5.619G
100 223.2G 161 6.742G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.54% 960.4M
Medium (100-1400B)7.04% 12.62G
Large (1401-1500B)92.33% 165.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 170.2M
Total100.00% 179.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.22% 73.90T 28.62% 51.31G 33.19% 2.954M
Encrypted Traffic7.58% 19.85T 7.79% 13.95G 5.91% 526.1k
Advanced Apps6.60% 17.27T 6.70% 12.01G 8.28% 737.0k
File Sharing3.35% 8.765T 3.35% 5.998G 2.59% 230.6k
Measurement1.71% 4.474T 1.80% 3.229G 0.27% 23.77k
Misc0.51% 1.341T 0.57% 1.015G 0.80% 71.29k
Games0.16% 407.5G 0.16% 283.6M 0.20% 18.15k
Audio/Video0.15% 398.7G 0.16% 286.3M 0.31% 27.28k
Unidentified51.73% 135.5T 50.86% 91.20G 48.45% 4.312M
Total100.00% 261.9T 100.00% 179.3G 100.00% 8.900M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.003G150013Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
655.6M900028AMES-NAS [24]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
366.7M150010Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
214.9M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
208.9M150019NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
178.2M139224NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
166.6M150020Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
164.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
158.2M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
99.16M149110Indiana [87]TRANSPAC [22388]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.060G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50193 -> 5101
1.053G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]36227 -> 5101
971.7M149910UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]55944 -> 3002
525.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]40045 -> 5101
376.4M900010USC-OBERON [47]Abilene [11537]53817 -> 3002
258.2M149619Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]HTTP
251.8M150016NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
249.4M142021Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50180 -> 36407
246.7M149660Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U Minnesota [217]HTTP
245.9M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 714.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.28% 235.8T 38.41% 297.6G
Encrypted Traffic6.27% 38.64T 6.98% 54.08G
Advanced Apps3.89% 23.97T 3.54% 27.43G
File Sharing3.67% 22.58T 4.06% 31.47G
Misc2.19% 13.51T 5.48% 42.49G
Audio/Video1.59% 9.766T 1.51% 11.69G
Measurement0.98% 6.011T 1.01% 7.790G
Games0.29% 1.779T 0.42% 3.224G
Unidentified42.84% 263.9T 38.60% 299.1G
Total100.00% 616.0T 100.00% 775.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
33.80%
1.94%
1.29%
1.26%
---
208.2T
11.92T
7.933T
7.744T
---
34.55%
1.59%
1.12%
1.15%
---
267.7G
12.30G
8.685G
8.929G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.56%
2.26%
0.44%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.93T
13.91T
2.704T
82.00G
6.045G
---
3.41%
2.99%
0.55%
0.02%
0.00%
---
26.43G
23.18G
4.280G
159.3M
30.49M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.12%
0.66%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.20T
4.087T
594.5G
48.15G
33.43G
10.50G
---
2.86%
0.55%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
---
22.15G
4.297G
610.0M
172.9M
79.49M
121.8M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.58%
0.96%
0.69%
0.28%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.726T
5.935T
4.222T
1.708T
787.7G
109.5G
59.81G
23.21G
3.750G
3.416G
1.809G
244.5M
3.093M
---
2.35%
0.77%
0.51%
0.28%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.19G
5.944G
3.945G
2.179G
851.2M
204.3M
80.42M
28.99M
6.857M
39.74M
1.833M
761.4k
13.30k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
NFS
AFS
X11
Telnet
IRC
NTP
RTIP
AOL AIM
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.26%
0.27%
0.22%
0.21%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.788T
1.642T
1.375T
1.316T
422.4G
328.4G
276.8G
83.04G
61.88G
46.33G
45.88G
41.69G
38.36G
25.69G
11.92G
6.864G
176.3M
---
2.69%
1.73%
0.36%
0.18%
0.05%
0.09%
0.08%
0.05%
0.05%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.83G
13.40G
2.756G
1.407G
425.9M
734.7M
658.2M
412.5M
363.2M
605.9M
379.2M
49.97M
251.4M
55.67M
93.80M
51.38M
1.784M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.09%
0.44%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.711T
2.735T
171.4G
75.45G
52.12G
12.62G
4.986G
3.402G
0.000
---
0.81%
0.64%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.242G
4.986G
288.1M
86.66M
62.72M
17.66M
8.518M
5.903M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.84%
0.16%
0.00%
---
5.192T
955.7G
0.000
---
0.63%
0.44%
0.00%
---
4.885G
3.389G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.21%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.320T
143.3G
113.4G
92.70G
83.11G
14.68G
11.45G
---
0.24%
0.05%
0.09%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.878G
373.9M
709.3M
89.63M
133.4M
21.54M
17.95M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.84%
---
263.9T
---
38.60%
---
299.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
616.0T
---
100.00%
---
775.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.16% 955.7G 0.44% 3.389G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.43M 0.00% 1.179M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 118.7G 0.02% 171.7M
TCP[6]88.63% 546.0T 84.93% 658.2G
UDP[17]7.78% 47.94T 12.13% 94.03G
IPv6[41]0.00% 10.06G 0.00% 28.68M
GRE[47]2.98% 18.35T 1.96% 15.16G
ESP[50]0.44% 2.704T 0.55% 4.280G
AX.25[93]0.00% 30.80k 0.00% 466.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.510G 0.00% 38.18M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 82.06G 0.02% 160.0M
Total100.00% 616.0T 100.00% 775.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.33% 297.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.34% 157.6G
Large (1401-1500B)40.67% 315.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.67% 5.169G
Total100.00% 775.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.26% 593.0T 97.13% 752.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.05% 292.7G 0.05% 423.8M
EF [DSCP=46]0.02% 112.3G 0.03% 232.2M
Other3.67% 22.61T 2.78% 21.57G
Total100.00% 616.0T 100.00% 775.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.39% 2.410T 0.24% 1.834G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.85% 5.246T 1.12% 8.689G
330010.64% 3.945T 0.34% 2.653G
21280.60% 3.679T 0.61% 4.723G
200000.55% 3.374T 0.37% 2.867G
200010.43% 2.629T 0.28% 2.172G