Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080602

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080602 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/1 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.98% of octets and 19.98% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.387M 2 10.07M
5 1.470M 6 10.41M
10 1.570M 12 10.93M
50 3.321M 58 18.15M
90 16.21M 59 46.95M
95 29.93M 59 64.35M
99 78.43M 59 158.7M
99.9 178.2M 59 424.6M
99.99 910.3M 118 1.178G
99.999 1.018G 119 3.919G
100 2.041G 119 6.676G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.90% 1.447G
Medium (100-1400B)7.00% 11.26G
Large (1401-1500B)91.95% 147.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.15% 241.9M
Total100.00% 160.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.52% 62.08T 27.22% 43.80G 28.33% 2.504M
Advanced Apps11.13% 26.05T 11.24% 18.08G 13.74% 1.214M
Encrypted Traffic9.19% 21.52T 9.62% 15.48G 7.06% 624.2k
File Sharing2.76% 6.472T 2.73% 4.394G 1.82% 160.7k
Misc0.72% 1.689T 0.79% 1.273G 1.12% 98.94k
Measurement0.66% 1.552T 0.69% 1.110G 0.15% 13.60k
Games0.24% 563.0G 0.25% 398.2M 0.30% 26.54k
Audio/Video0.15% 351.0G 0.16% 256.2M 0.27% 23.52k
Unidentified48.62% 113.8T 47.30% 76.10G 47.22% 4.175M
Total100.00% 234.1T 100.00% 160.9G 100.00% 8.842M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
235.2M150037SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
206.7M150022NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
181.9M139125NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
173.2M150022NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
160.1M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
149.3M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
90.76M141321NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
80.57M150013DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
73.78M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
66.38M150029NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.034G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]51771 -> 5101
1.027G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]45143 -> 5101
1.012G900046INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]56760 -> 5150
559.1M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]58245 -> 5101
263.3M150045MIEN1 [11442]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]61026 -> 59652
247.8M150060Indiana [87]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
238.2M147611NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
237.8M150043SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]22250 -> 58661
229.4M150022NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
215.9M150026INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Brookhaven National Lab [43]60308 -> 30000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 686.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.58% 231.7T 40.38% 325.2G
Encrypted Traffic7.14% 41.79T 7.46% 60.12G
Advanced Apps5.84% 34.21T 4.72% 38.02G
File Sharing3.40% 19.90T 4.03% 32.49G
Misc2.63% 15.39T 5.32% 42.84G
Audio/Video1.65% 9.681T 1.47% 11.80G
Measurement0.45% 2.644T 0.67% 5.437G
Games0.34% 1.962T 0.44% 3.583G
Unidentified38.97% 228.1T 35.50% 285.9G
Total100.00% 585.5T 100.00% 805.5G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
35.19%
1.49%
1.46%
1.43%
---
206.0T
8.701T
8.568T
8.400T
---
36.94%
1.19%
1.18%
1.07%
---
297.5G
9.616G
9.482G
8.625G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.16%
2.51%
0.45%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.37T
14.69T
2.635T
74.97G
5.809G
---
3.72%
3.18%
0.54%
0.02%
0.00%
---
29.94G
25.64G
4.349G
153.5M
29.03M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.19%
2.09%
0.48%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.69T
12.24T
2.806T
409.1G
46.80G
7.842G
---
2.64%
1.63%
0.37%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.24G
13.15G
3.018G
397.2M
108.1M
101.5M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.74%
0.65%
0.65%
0.25%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.19T
3.804T
3.800T
1.462T
459.8G
97.52G
51.25G
22.47G
3.954G
2.919G
649.2M
515.7M
67.19M
---
2.58%
0.63%
0.44%
0.25%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.76G
5.058G
3.539G
2.051G
713.7M
210.5M
74.82M
25.32M
48.24M
4.777M
1.063M
1.874M
107.1k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
RTIP
MS Windows
NTP
Telnet
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
RPC Portmapper
---
1.74%
0.27%
0.26%
0.20%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.18T
1.575T
1.508T
1.193T
326.7G
172.5G
113.5G
78.63G
56.61G
50.01G
45.92G
44.56G
12.08G
10.75G
10.22G
7.799G
181.8M
---
2.78%
1.60%
0.36%
0.15%
0.08%
0.06%
0.01%
0.05%
0.06%
0.03%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.36G
12.84G
2.928G
1.188G
637.0M
476.7M
110.1M
408.0M
472.0M
246.6M
603.2M
370.1M
103.1M
53.47M
13.44M
17.40M
1.351M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.09%
0.51%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.366T
2.991T
198.5G
60.47G
39.00G
15.58G
6.037G
3.286G
0.000
---
0.68%
0.73%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.491G
5.880G
270.9M
80.91M
50.04M
18.79M
9.002M
8.384M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.41%
0.30%
0.00%
---
2.392T
1.762T
191.1M
---
0.34%
2.37%
0.00%
---
2.708G
19.09G
127.4k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.25%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.492T
243.9G
112.1G
59.53G
34.85G
13.86G
4.921G
---
0.25%
0.07%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.050G
530.8M
779.3M
140.6M
51.73M
19.26M
10.68M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.97%
---
228.1T
---
35.50%
---
285.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
585.5T
---
100.00%
---
805.5G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.30% 1.762T 2.37% 19.09G
IGMP[2]0.00% 72.41M 0.00% 1.229M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 64.02G 0.02% 127.8M
TCP[6]90.39% 529.2T 86.48% 696.6G
UDP[17]7.33% 42.89T 11.37% 91.61G
IPv6[41]0.00% 7.259G 0.00% 24.67M
GRE[47]1.76% 10.33T 1.22% 9.867G
ESP[50]0.45% 2.635T 0.54% 4.349G
AX.25[93]0.00% 30.45M 0.00% 20.30k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.086G 0.00% 36.79M
IPMP[169]0.00% 191.1M 0.00% 127.4k
Other0.01% 82.09G 0.02% 158.7M
Total100.00% 585.5T 100.00% 805.5G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.28% 340.5G
Medium (100-1400B)21.01% 169.2G
Large (1401-1500B)36.66% 295.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 350.9M
Total100.00% 805.5G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.45% 564.7T 97.31% 783.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.07% 436.9G 0.07% 565.9M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 42.57G 0.02% 177.0M
Other3.47% 20.29T 2.60% 20.95G
Total100.00% 585.5T 100.00% 805.5G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.48% 2.785T 0.26% 2.081G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
543210.13% 732.2G 0.06% 490.4M
200000.12% 697.0G 0.14% 1.136G
200010.12% 680.3G 0.13% 1.013G
19350.11% 635.4G 0.13% 1.020G
150000.06% 378.7G 0.06% 516.6M