Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080526

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080526 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.82% of octets and 20.64% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 3 10.05M
5 1.492M 9 10.50M
10 1.620M 17 11.10M
50 3.274M 58 18.45M
90 13.12M 59 50.70M
95 21.49M 59 72.60M
99 53.00M 59 162.1M
99.9 127.9M 59 323.4M
99.99 581.8M 119 842.9M
99.999 993.3M 123 1.262G
100 1.489G 123 2.164G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.29% 471.1M
Medium (100-1400B)6.69% 10.76G
Large (1401-1500B)92.93% 149.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 136.6M
Total100.00% 160.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.39% 62.10T 26.70% 42.95G 30.96% 2.638M
Encrypted Traffic8.59% 20.21T 8.78% 14.13G 7.17% 611.2k
Advanced Apps7.54% 17.74T 7.59% 12.20G 8.64% 735.9k
File Sharing3.49% 8.217T 3.50% 5.624G 2.37% 201.7k
Measurement0.60% 1.409T 0.61% 985.5M 0.17% 14.61k
Misc0.42% 981.1G 0.48% 769.7M 0.79% 66.92k
Games0.21% 491.8G 0.21% 342.9M 0.26% 21.72k
Audio/Video0.17% 403.0G 0.17% 278.4M 0.33% 28.32k
Unidentified52.59% 123.7T 51.96% 83.59G 49.31% 4.201M
Total100.00% 235.3T 100.00% 160.8G 100.00% 8.520M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
300.9M150040SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
219.6M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
181.6M139313NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
176.8M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
169.6M150023NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
146.8M150019NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
89.66M141511NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
89.62M150010Indiana [87]TRANSPAC [22388]Iperf
86.23M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
77.66M150021NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.036G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]44222 -> 5101
971.7M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]57316 -> 5101
506.7M149917SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]23232 -> 48894
504.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]44523 -> 5101
379.7M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [25776]50000 -> 43067
240.0M142011Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50027 -> 46772
232.0M147724NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
223.5M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
215.1M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
196.8M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]53922 -> 51531

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 692.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.89% 224.2T 38.37% 299.0G
Encrypted Traffic6.49% 37.44T 6.75% 52.61G
Advanced Apps4.30% 24.78T 3.52% 27.45G
File Sharing4.03% 23.24T 4.43% 34.49G
Misc2.84% 16.37T 6.83% 53.22G
Audio/Video1.68% 9.709T 1.42% 11.08G
Measurement0.41% 2.351T 0.70% 5.429G
Games0.33% 1.905T 0.46% 3.561G
Unidentified41.02% 236.4T 37.52% 292.4G
Total100.00% 576.5T 100.00% 779.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
34.91%
1.42%
1.33%
1.23%
---
201.2T
8.181T
7.695T
7.063T
---
35.13%
1.11%
1.13%
1.01%
---
273.7G
8.625G
8.768G
7.896G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.01%
2.04%
0.43%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.10T
11.75T
2.492T
78.26G
5.945G
---
3.55%
2.62%
0.56%
0.02%
0.00%
---
27.69G
20.39G
4.334G
153.0M
30.31M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
3.30%
0.57%
0.42%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.04T
3.283T
2.399T
31.39G
15.51G
11.18G
---
2.74%
0.42%
0.32%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
---
21.39G
3.249G
2.468G
71.19M
161.3M
109.7M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.76%
0.98%
0.78%
0.34%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.17T
5.639T
4.513T
1.952T
765.4G
117.4G
56.49G
16.01G
4.777G
4.068G
3.949G
902.6M
554.4k
---
2.64%
0.75%
0.54%
0.33%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.56G
5.808G
4.242G
2.563G
909.9M
241.5M
80.00M
24.45M
9.399M
3.569M
46.22M
1.656M
9.800k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
AFS
X11
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
NFS
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.42%
0.61%
0.35%
0.28%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.196T
3.494T
1.998T
1.622T
402.1G
261.0G
94.03G
60.57G
54.70G
49.64G
48.61G
32.56G
25.35G
20.27G
11.54G
3.275G
228.6M
---
2.75%
0.36%
2.79%
0.39%
0.09%
0.08%
0.05%
0.08%
0.06%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.45G
2.836G
21.75G
3.059G
722.8M
611.5M
412.3M
608.4M
506.2M
639.8M
356.1M
58.10M
35.19M
64.49M
92.60M
6.773M
2.277M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.20%
0.43%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.916T
2.474T
172.5G
67.00G
58.79G
14.67G
2.833G
2.184G
0.000
---
0.79%
0.58%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.125G
4.521G
250.4M
75.63M
82.50M
19.55M
5.613M
4.180M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.36%
0.17%
0.00%
---
2.064T
1.002T
0.000
---
0.31%
1.37%
0.00%
---
2.384G
10.65G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.24%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.385T
171.1G
121.2G
101.1G
75.33G
45.62G
5.355G
---
0.25%
0.06%
0.11%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.956G
458.9M
823.6M
112.7M
146.8M
51.52M
11.19M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.02%
---
236.4T
---
37.52%
---
292.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
576.5T
---
100.00%
---
779.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.17% 1.002T 1.37% 10.65G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.35M 0.00% 1.246M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 90.16G 0.02% 123.2M
TCP[6]90.25% 520.2T 83.27% 648.9G
UDP[17]7.98% 45.98T 14.74% 114.8G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.661G 0.00% 23.79M
GRE[47]1.27% 7.297T 1.00% 7.814G
ESP[50]0.43% 2.492T 0.56% 4.334G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 4.787G 0.01% 44.00M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 78.31G 0.02% 153.5M
Total100.00% 576.5T 100.00% 779.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.52% 323.6G
Medium (100-1400B)20.09% 156.6G
Large (1401-1500B)37.93% 295.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.45% 3.524G
Total100.00% 779.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.66% 551.5T 96.74% 754.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.05% 262.1G 0.05% 420.9M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 18.76G 0.01% 98.61M
Other4.29% 24.75T 3.19% 24.89G
Total100.00% 576.5T 100.00% 779.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.51% 2.942T 0.31% 2.437G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.22% 1.250T 0.15% 1.164G
19350.19% 1.123T 0.25% 1.972G
200020.17% 971.4G 0.11% 821.9M
200010.15% 879.9G 0.10% 766.2M
543210.15% 872.5G 0.08% 584.9M