Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080519

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080519 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.15% of octets and 15.81% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.05M
5 1.488M 8 10.50M
10 1.612M 14 10.95M
50 3.368M 58 17.89M
90 13.69M 59 48.84M
95 22.94M 59 65.75M
99 63.79M 59 142.9M
99.9 137.6M 59 334.3M
99.99 924.4M 60 995.9M
99.999 1.042G 119 1.266G
100 4.753G 120 6.748G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.67% 1.011G
Medium (100-1400B)8.62% 13.03G
Large (1401-1500B)90.58% 136.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.13% 194.3M
Total100.00% 151.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.53% 78.03T 36.25% 54.78G 39.94% 3.313M
Encrypted Traffic10.32% 22.66T 10.36% 15.65G 7.85% 651.3k
Advanced Apps5.46% 11.98T 5.42% 8.185G 6.03% 500.4k
File Sharing3.96% 8.702T 3.92% 5.925G 2.71% 225.1k
Misc0.73% 1.604T 0.77% 1.170G 1.22% 101.1k
Measurement0.69% 1.504T 0.67% 1.011G 0.18% 15.22k
Games0.25% 549.1G 0.26% 391.4M 0.33% 27.29k
Audio/Video0.22% 477.5G 0.22% 333.2M 0.40% 32.90k
Unidentified42.84% 94.08T 42.13% 63.66G 41.33% 3.429M
Total100.00% 219.6T 100.00% 151.1G 100.00% 8.296M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
975.5M844330UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
920.5M900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
876.3M900024Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
256.7M150022NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]Iperf
216.9M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
181.0M138914NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
168.4M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
166.9M150013NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
122.5M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
105.8M142030NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.028G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]51677 -> 5101
1.027G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]36945 -> 5101
598.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]60248 -> 5101
246.9M149513Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]HTTP
241.5M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
241.2M142020Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50130 -> 42474
240.5M150014NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
238.3M147716NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
194.7M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
192.9M150023Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Virginia Tech [1312]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 652.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.69% 305.2T 44.64% 426.7G
Encrypted Traffic6.62% 45.23T 6.95% 66.39G
File Sharing3.63% 24.79T 4.01% 38.33G
Advanced Apps2.77% 18.94T 2.21% 21.12G
Misc2.67% 18.22T 5.69% 54.40G
Audio/Video1.51% 10.29T 1.42% 13.52G
Measurement1.26% 8.579T 1.06% 10.15G
Games0.34% 2.324T 0.48% 4.606G
Unidentified36.51% 249.3T 33.55% 320.7G
Total100.00% 683.0T 100.00% 956.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
40.59%
1.48%
1.40%
1.23%
---
277.2T
10.11T
9.549T
8.382T
---
41.39%
1.10%
1.14%
1.01%
---
395.6G
10.55G
10.86G
9.640G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.86%
2.35%
0.41%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.33T
16.05T
2.775T
63.82G
6.432G
---
3.31%
3.15%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
31.63G
30.14G
4.443G
134.0M
35.37M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.60%
0.92%
0.58%
0.36%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.91T
6.287T
3.989T
2.439T
902.2G
148.3G
75.87G
22.81G
5.754G
4.558G
2.937G
84.84M
1.703M
---
2.32%
0.73%
0.39%
0.40%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.18G
6.976G
3.769G
3.800G
1.044G
330.8M
117.0M
36.20M
67.71M
8.266M
2.683M
322.0k
17.15k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
2.38%
0.26%
0.13%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.24T
1.747T
897.0G
31.81G
13.63G
8.989G
---
1.91%
0.18%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
18.22G
1.715G
870.7M
74.17M
129.1M
108.8M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
IDENT
RTIP
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.61%
0.32%
0.30%
0.21%
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.99T
2.161T
2.062T
1.415T
698.6G
260.0G
210.2G
103.1G
79.16G
64.70G
56.28G
47.85G
41.28G
19.22G
11.73G
5.993G
322.2M
---
2.76%
1.90%
0.37%
0.15%
0.11%
0.08%
0.02%
0.07%
0.01%
0.06%
0.08%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.41G
18.15G
3.554G
1.404G
1.064G
719.0M
222.1M
684.8M
123.3M
539.8M
731.0M
364.8M
282.8M
38.19M
95.23M
9.996M
1.891M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.92%
0.52%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.300T
3.567T
277.6G
76.06G
58.22G
10.37G
4.936G
2.499G
0.000
---
0.61%
0.75%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.802G
7.148G
377.9M
101.6M
69.02M
15.54M
8.772M
4.838M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.21%
0.17%
0.00%
---
8.251T
1.148T
0.000
---
0.71%
1.24%
0.00%
---
6.780G
11.80G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.23%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.587T
413.4G
134.9G
100.1G
67.35G
14.96G
6.378G
---
0.25%
0.09%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.402G
823.4M
1.080G
184.6M
71.03M
28.67M
16.17M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
36.51%
---
249.3T
---
33.55%
---
320.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
683.0T
---
100.00%
---
956.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.17% 1.148T 1.24% 11.80G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.56M 0.00% 1.220M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 177.9G 0.03% 259.4M
TCP[6]86.50% 590.8T 83.49% 798.1G
UDP[17]7.69% 52.53T 11.84% 113.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 29.24G 0.02% 163.8M
GRE[47]5.31% 36.26T 3.78% 36.15G
ESP[50]0.41% 2.775T 0.46% 4.443G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 5.103G 0.00% 45.75M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 63.87G 0.01% 134.5M
Total100.00% 683.0T 100.00% 956.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.82% 409.3G
Medium (100-1400B)21.20% 202.6G
Large (1401-1500B)33.91% 324.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.08% 19.85G
Total100.00% 956.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.83% 654.5T 96.97% 927.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.11% 783.6G 0.11% 1.062G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 49.53G 0.02% 223.1M
Other4.05% 27.64T 2.90% 27.68G
Total100.00% 683.0T 100.00% 956.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 3.187T 0.30% 2.872G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.24% 1.636T 0.29% 2.806G
21280.18% 1.205T 0.16% 1.564G
150000.11% 779.1G 0.11% 1.065G
191010.09% 617.2G 0.07% 646.3M
44440.08% 563.0G 0.04% 429.5M