Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080428

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080428 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.82% of octets and 15.85% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 2 10.05M
5 1.484M 7 10.50M
10 1.597M 14 10.95M
50 3.318M 58 17.75M
90 15.81M 59 50.55M
95 25.52M 59 75.97M
99 61.95M 59 170.5M
99.9 135.2M 59 436.9M
99.99 916.2M 113 1.348G
99.999 1.038G 119 3.638G
100 21.60G 120 4.649G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.44% 734.7M
Medium (100-1400B)7.41% 12.34G
Large (1401-1500B)91.89% 153.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.26% 431.0M
Total100.00% 166.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers25.83% 63.06T 26.33% 43.84G 32.07% 2.782M
Encrypted Traffic6.37% 15.54T 6.48% 10.79G 5.20% 451.1k
Advanced Apps4.50% 10.98T 4.56% 7.591G 5.73% 496.8k
File Sharing3.39% 8.287T 3.44% 5.730G 2.66% 230.6k
Measurement1.64% 4.012T 0.75% 1.248G 0.17% 14.64k
Misc0.45% 1.089T 0.46% 773.8M 0.81% 70.51k
Games0.33% 815.1G 0.34% 566.8M 0.41% 35.35k
Audio/Video0.18% 434.9G 0.18% 305.6M 0.34% 29.53k
Unidentified57.31% 139.9T 57.45% 95.65G 52.62% 4.566M
Total100.00% 244.1T 100.00% 166.5G 100.00% 8.677M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.110G900014Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.026G900014ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
889.1M150017ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
701.4M150030UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
185.1M139211NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
166.4M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
160.9M150010NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
154.6M900029Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
120.7M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
110.4M142022NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.051G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]Audiogalaxy
1.026G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]46232 -> 5101
981.1M900029INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]40866 -> 5150
557.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]58689 -> 5101
340.3M138924SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]2222 -> 36800
308.6M900022NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]54847 -> 50000
293.7M150014TACCNET [32093]SDSC [195]47336 -> 50000
287.2M150031Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
272.0M900014TACCNET [32093]NCSA [1224]47135 -> 50002
264.9M149936Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]BCnet Backbone [271]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 683.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.68% 286.4T 41.95% 440.6G
Encrypted Traffic4.89% 35.26T 5.36% 56.34G
File Sharing3.55% 25.63T 3.82% 40.08G
Advanced Apps2.46% 17.73T 2.07% 21.77G
Misc2.06% 14.86T 4.23% 44.45G
Audio/Video1.57% 11.30T 1.35% 14.19G
Measurement0.76% 5.457T 0.64% 6.733G
Games0.44% 3.197T 0.76% 7.956G
Unidentified44.60% 322.0T 39.81% 418.0G
Total100.00% 721.9T 100.00% 1.050T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
36.04%
1.48%
1.23%
0.92%
---
260.2T
10.69T
8.914T
6.636T
---
39.16%
1.12%
0.93%
0.74%
---
411.2G
11.75G
9.770G
7.820G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.46%
2.16%
0.26%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.72T
15.56T
1.888T
82.91G
7.090G
---
2.26%
2.78%
0.30%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.78G
29.20G
3.180G
144.1M
30.19M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.40%
0.90%
0.56%
0.48%
0.14%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.11T
6.489T
4.042T
3.496T
1.016T
347.7G
72.38G
28.26G
12.72G
6.704G
2.122G
1.379G
8.660M
---
1.97%
0.67%
0.64%
0.31%
0.12%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.71G
7.046G
6.721G
3.288G
1.270G
713.6M
115.4M
44.94M
153.3M
12.77M
2.002M
2.080M
48.80k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.90%
0.39%
0.11%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.69T
2.822T
802.4G
372.0G
33.76G
7.045G
---
1.50%
0.44%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
---
15.73G
4.645G
852.4M
378.1M
67.82M
104.2M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
NTP
AOL AIM
MS Windows
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.16%
0.26%
0.24%
0.24%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.361T
1.876T
1.756T
1.739T
392.4G
216.2G
79.16G
79.13G
72.02G
65.56G
52.12G
47.65G
45.99G
39.54G
36.67G
8.847G
440.0M
---
1.93%
0.19%
1.38%
0.30%
0.09%
0.06%
0.01%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.31G
1.961G
14.49G
3.121G
909.9M
597.3M
120.0M
833.6M
437.3M
434.1M
679.0M
56.92M
284.4M
80.13M
57.66M
72.04M
2.395M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.07%
0.43%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.745T
3.129T
211.1G
126.6G
68.91G
15.42G
7.596G
4.239G
0.000
---
0.68%
0.61%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.101G
6.454G
350.1M
164.1M
84.21M
24.27M
11.62M
9.825M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.71%
0.05%
0.00%
---
5.118T
338.3G
300.0k
---
0.29%
0.35%
0.00%
---
3.050G
3.682G
200.0
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.28%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.033T
342.9G
308.9G
299.7G
153.2G
30.00G
28.93G
---
0.30%
0.27%
0.10%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.142G
2.830G
1.061G
474.3M
303.7M
53.86M
90.13M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.60%
---
322.0T
---
39.81%
---
418.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
721.9T
---
100.00%
---
1.050T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 338.3G 0.35% 3.682G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.17M 0.00% 1.159M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 114.0G 0.01% 154.9M
TCP[6]87.28% 630.1T 83.46% 876.5G
UDP[17]8.51% 61.42T 13.05% 137.0G
IPv6[41]0.00% 20.45G 0.01% 63.07M
GRE[47]3.87% 27.95T 2.80% 29.43G
ESP[50]0.26% 1.888T 0.30% 3.180G
AX.25[93]0.00% 198.0k 0.00% 600.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.297G 0.00% 35.23M
IPMP[169]0.00% 300.0k 0.00% 200.0
Other0.01% 83.06G 0.01% 145.1M
Total100.00% 721.9T 100.00% 1.050T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.33% 455.0G
Medium (100-1400B)22.94% 240.9G
Large (1401-1500B)33.52% 352.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.21% 2.243G
Total100.00% 1.050T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.95% 692.7T 97.18% 1.020T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.114T 0.15% 1.566G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 31.73G 0.02% 158.3M
Other3.89% 28.08T 2.66% 27.91G
Total100.00% 721.9T 100.00% 1.050T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 3.273T 0.29% 3.008G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.97% 7.004T 0.68% 7.175G
19350.80% 5.791T 1.01% 10.63G
200010.70% 5.042T 0.45% 4.691G
330010.66% 4.794T 0.31% 3.224G
200020.47% 3.426T 0.29% 3.090G