Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080421

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080421 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.32% of octets and 14.90% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 2 10.06M
5 1.493M 8 10.50M
10 1.617M 15 11.07M
50 3.200M 58 18.00M
90 14.44M 59 46.71M
95 23.78M 59 63.00M
99 67.64M 59 149.2M
99.9 147.4M 59 404.5M
99.99 656.5M 59 1.385G
99.999 1.015G 118 3.698G
100 63.77G 119 12.58G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.42% 629.6M
Medium (100-1400B)7.98% 11.91G
Large (1401-1500B)91.34% 136.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.25% 373.1M
Total100.00% 149.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.98% 61.36T 28.61% 42.70G 32.47% 2.683M
Encrypted Traffic7.42% 16.26T 7.59% 11.33G 6.37% 526.2k
Advanced Apps5.02% 11.00T 5.09% 7.594G 6.09% 503.1k
File Sharing3.64% 7.973T 3.68% 5.490G 2.62% 216.4k
Measurement1.95% 4.269T 0.97% 1.454G 0.22% 18.21k
Misc0.54% 1.178T 0.58% 868.7M 0.78% 64.20k
Games0.32% 702.9G 0.33% 493.7M 0.39% 32.39k
Audio/Video0.17% 379.6G 0.18% 265.7M 0.31% 25.78k
Unidentified52.97% 116.1T 52.97% 79.06G 50.76% 4.196M
Total100.00% 219.3T 100.00% 149.2G 100.00% 8.266M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.074G900010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.013G900024ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
705.5M150024UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
265.9M150028UW-Milwaukee [7050]NYSERNet [3756]Iperf
223.7M150020CERN [513]Unknown [32361]Iperf
184.5M139110NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
165.9M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
164.4M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.3M150025NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
137.3M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.730G900058INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Chicago [160]40469 -> 64999
1.025G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]44563 -> 5101
566.2M898910Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]36154 -> 5101
538.4M150010NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]44885 -> 3002
382.7M149916Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UCR-EDU [6106]HTTP
336.2M138320SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]2222 -> 46591
257.5M900013NASA-AERONET [10343]TACCNET [32093]SSH
241.2M130010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Abilene [11537]1807 -> 3002
240.7M149917NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
236.0M148024NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 656.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.20% 272.7T 41.89% 419.6G
Encrypted Traffic5.40% 36.62T 5.61% 56.22G
File Sharing3.56% 24.17T 3.82% 38.23G
Advanced Apps2.55% 17.27T 2.10% 21.05G
Misc2.20% 14.95T 4.67% 46.81G
Audio/Video1.63% 11.07T 1.38% 13.79G
Measurement0.81% 5.481T 0.57% 5.753G
Games0.43% 2.899T 0.71% 7.072G
Unidentified43.22% 293.2T 39.25% 393.2G
Total100.00% 678.5T 100.00% 1.001T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
36.37%
1.33%
1.25%
1.25%
---
246.7T
9.034T
8.493T
8.468T
---
38.98%
0.97%
0.99%
0.95%
---
390.4G
9.758G
9.870G
9.552G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.84%
2.19%
0.35%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.28T
14.85T
2.407T
72.35G
5.248G
---
2.53%
2.68%
0.39%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.31G
26.80G
3.946G
134.4M
25.19M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.38%
0.78%
0.60%
0.60%
0.13%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.390T
5.298T
4.062T
4.045T
895.2G
357.9G
73.17G
30.25G
12.95G
8.640G
1.776G
443.0M
57.95M
---
1.89%
0.60%
0.73%
0.38%
0.11%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.89G
5.974G
7.355G
3.794G
1.130G
746.5M
112.5M
52.90M
156.5M
15.87M
2.690M
749.4k
96.70k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.99%
0.45%
0.08%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.49T
3.037T
513.7G
185.5G
27.57G
11.87G
---
1.54%
0.46%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
15.41G
4.657G
627.9M
190.2M
58.56M
107.9M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
NFS
AFS
IRC
RTIP
AOL AIM
IDENT
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.21%
0.29%
0.26%
0.25%
0.08%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.181T
1.933T
1.736T
1.675T
522.6G
266.0G
226.9G
74.83G
61.72G
49.92G
47.56G
47.23G
46.65G
46.54G
20.21G
12.33G
474.6M
---
2.02%
0.21%
1.43%
0.30%
0.39%
0.03%
0.06%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.03%
0.06%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.20G
2.054G
14.34G
2.985G
3.952G
251.6M
583.6M
421.3M
458.7M
58.52M
89.20M
355.8M
328.3M
609.6M
39.52M
73.19M
2.358M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.14%
0.44%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.745T
2.976T
172.9G
98.51G
55.50G
18.49G
3.647G
2.629G
15.18M
---
0.71%
0.61%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.122G
6.128G
298.7M
126.9M
71.04M
26.45M
9.447M
7.142M
11.20k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.76%
0.05%
0.00%
---
5.125T
356.1G
0.000
---
0.31%
0.26%
0.00%
---
3.102G
2.651G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.30%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.004T
269.3G
259.4G
178.0G
132.1G
28.29G
28.15G
---
0.31%
0.23%
0.10%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.086G
2.313G
961.7M
297.5M
271.2M
93.12M
49.16M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.22%
---
293.2T
---
39.25%
---
393.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
678.5T
---
100.00%
---
1.001T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 356.1G 0.26% 2.651G
IGMP[2]0.00% 40.48M 0.00% 1.139M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 94.36G 0.01% 138.9M
TCP[6]87.12% 591.1T 83.44% 835.9G
UDP[17]9.28% 62.95T 13.69% 137.1G
IPv6[41]0.00% 17.65G 0.01% 60.97M
GRE[47]3.13% 21.25T 2.15% 21.52G
ESP[50]0.35% 2.407T 0.39% 3.946G
AX.25[93]0.00% 86.40k 0.00% 900.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.862G 0.00% 32.05M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.04% 280.4G 0.04% 393.7M
Total100.00% 678.5T 100.00% 1.001T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.96% 440.3G
Medium (100-1400B)23.13% 231.7G
Large (1401-1500B)32.13% 321.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.79% 7.866G
Total100.00% 1.001T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.99% 644.5T 96.64% 968.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 1.279T 0.21% 2.068G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 37.31G 0.02% 178.8M
Other4.81% 32.66T 3.14% 31.45G
Total100.00% 678.5T 100.00% 1.001T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.40% 2.737T 0.26% 2.581G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.39% 9.412T 0.81% 8.158G
200011.02% 6.902T 0.57% 5.743G
19350.70% 4.738T 0.85% 8.479G
200020.69% 4.649T 0.40% 3.966G
163840.54% 3.651T 0.43% 4.276G