Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080407

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080407 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 31.16% of octets and 14.50% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.385M 2 10.05M
5 1.460M 8 10.36M
10 1.547M 16 10.80M
50 2.918M 58 16.61M
90 13.83M 59 44.28M
95 23.79M 59 63.60M
99 68.64M 59 156.4M
99.9 146.4M 59 367.6M
99.99 907.8M 59 1.260G
99.999 1.023G 60 3.349G
100 4.683G 120 28.31G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.23% 378.3M
Medium (100-1400B)9.02% 14.80G
Large (1401-1500B)90.48% 148.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 440.5M
Total100.00% 164.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.50% 68.91T 29.14% 47.86G 33.05% 3.114M
Encrypted Traffic8.03% 19.41T 8.24% 13.53G 5.91% 556.5k
Advanced Apps3.88% 9.380T 3.94% 6.464G 4.55% 429.0k
File Sharing3.72% 9.003T 3.75% 6.160G 2.63% 248.0k
Measurement1.37% 3.310T 0.65% 1.063G 0.16% 14.67k
Misc0.44% 1.063T 0.48% 780.6M 0.71% 66.59k
Games0.25% 613.3G 0.26% 429.5M 0.31% 29.30k
Audio/Video0.18% 423.1G 0.18% 298.3M 0.31% 28.80k
Unidentified53.63% 129.6T 53.37% 87.64G 52.38% 4.935M
Total100.00% 241.7T 100.00% 164.2G 100.00% 9.422M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.942G900057DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.038G900023Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.001G900023ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
959.8M899722AMES-NAS [24]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
182.6M139520NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
174.9M150029NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
168.9M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
156.9M150018NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
153.8M150015NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
90.33M141310NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.038G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]58452 -> 5101
1.018G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]46157 -> 5101
568.5M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]37365 -> 5101
455.9M887316DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
258.3M150054UCAR [194]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM
252.9M150025NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
242.6M150015UCLA [52]U Oregon [3582]49001 -> 1870
241.9M142023Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50226 -> 43899
235.9M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
234.9M147828NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 762.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.15% 327.0T 41.55% 470.4G
Encrypted Traffic5.19% 40.28T 5.20% 58.94G
File Sharing3.36% 26.05T 3.48% 39.37G
Advanced Apps2.00% 15.51T 1.60% 18.11G
Misc1.85% 14.39T 3.97% 44.97G
Audio/Video1.35% 10.46T 1.18% 13.38G
Measurement0.62% 4.799T 0.49% 5.541G
Games0.41% 3.167T 0.70% 7.891G
Unidentified43.07% 334.2T 41.83% 473.7G
Total100.00% 775.9T 100.00% 1.132T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
38.60%
1.31%
1.19%
1.04%
---
299.5T
10.19T
9.251T
8.041T
---
38.83%
0.98%
0.89%
0.85%
---
439.7G
11.05G
10.08G
9.615G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.69%
2.07%
0.41%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.86T
16.07T
3.195T
147.7G
5.419G
---
2.36%
2.45%
0.37%
0.02%
0.00%
---
26.74G
27.70G
4.203G
255.7M
28.19M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.22%
0.88%
0.53%
0.52%
0.13%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.487T
6.813T
4.117T
4.066T
1.032T
394.5G
79.54G
32.38G
18.74G
10.16G
3.063G
419.8M
21.94M
---
1.59%
0.66%
0.65%
0.34%
0.11%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.06G
7.502G
7.340G
3.879G
1.270G
896.7M
124.7M
52.35M
221.8M
14.94M
4.606M
974.2k
35.70k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.66%
0.21%
0.10%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.90T
1.595T
775.6G
203.5G
30.64G
8.793G
---
1.30%
0.20%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.68G
2.229G
802.5M
209.7M
64.57M
122.6M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
SOCKS
RPC Portmapper
---
1.03%
0.24%
0.21%
0.21%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.993T
1.827T
1.621T
1.602T
537.8G
253.4G
97.05G
90.78G
68.77G
65.05G
60.20G
52.31G
46.00G
34.37G
23.86G
18.97G
606.9M
---
1.80%
1.32%
0.16%
0.25%
0.10%
0.06%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.03%
0.03%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.42G
14.98G
1.822G
2.833G
1.157G
684.7M
647.0M
585.5M
116.5M
347.7M
384.3M
684.8M
57.62M
79.15M
115.7M
36.14M
3.550M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.87%
0.41%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.787T
3.174T
253.5G
138.1G
80.47G
20.32G
4.094G
2.899G
0.000
---
0.57%
0.56%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.398G
6.304G
353.4M
178.8M
105.2M
32.71M
9.392M
6.791M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.58%
0.07%
0.00%
---
4.507T
510.8G
8.005M
---
0.25%
0.42%
0.00%
---
2.796G
4.803G
87.89k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.28%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.175T
348.8G
290.2G
132.9G
130.6G
62.51G
26.93G
---
0.30%
0.25%
0.10%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.348G
2.794G
1.115G
286.0M
179.3M
84.69M
82.57M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.07%
---
334.2T
---
41.83%
---
473.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
775.9T
---
100.00%
---
1.132T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 510.8G 0.42% 4.803G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.01M 0.00% 1.229M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 41.77G 0.01% 73.22M
TCP[6]88.13% 683.8T 81.36% 921.3G
UDP[17]7.96% 61.76T 15.56% 176.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 17.33G 0.01% 59.28M
GRE[47]3.30% 25.60T 2.31% 26.12G
ESP[50]0.41% 3.195T 0.37% 4.203G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.424M 0.00% 6.475k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.089G 0.00% 37.49M
IPMP[169]0.00% 8.005M 0.00% 87.89k
Other0.15% 1.183T 0.14% 1.545G
Total100.00% 775.9T 100.00% 1.132T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.09% 499.2G
Medium (100-1400B)22.03% 249.4G
Large (1401-1500B)33.02% 373.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.87% 9.860G
Total100.00% 1.132T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.90% 751.9T 97.68% 1.106T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 1.484T 0.25% 2.787G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 35.67G 0.01% 167.9M
Other2.91% 22.56T 2.06% 23.32G
Total100.00% 775.9T 100.00% 1.132T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.35% 2.721T 0.23% 2.579G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.64% 4.966T 0.74% 8.347G
21280.35% 2.678T 0.31% 3.490G
163840.29% 2.274T 0.23% 2.633G
30740.25% 1.949T 0.76% 8.659G
150000.25% 1.941T 0.23% 2.630G